Painless Hair Removal at Home with Ulike

When it comes to home hair removal options, the Ulike Air 3 uses IPL (intense
pulsed light) in their home hair removal device. With ice-cooling technology and
high-energy intense pulsed light, this device is extremely effective but not
extremely painful.

What is Ulike Sapphire Technology?

The Ulike Sapphire IPL hair removal device uses cutting-edge technology to both remove
hair long-term and do it in a way that is less painful than traditional laser
hair removal. Intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy was first developed in 1992 by
Drs. Goldman, Fitzpatrick, and Eckhouse for the treatment of leg
telangiectasias. IPL, the technology used by Ulike, uses these same wavelengths
of light to target and destroy the roots of the hair by thermodynamically
heating the follicle’s pigment (melanin)¹. Sapphire Ice-Cooling Technology™ provides powerful protection for the skin by thermoregulating
the device’s tip to remain at a cool temperature despite the heat of the light
flashes.

While other devices get very hot and can cause burns or irritation, the Ulike
Sapphire remains cool and protects the skin. Ulike technology targets the roots
of the hairs most effectively with its specially designed head that fits ,
leading to their long-term destruction and therefore decreased or no growth.
Not only is this technology extremely effective, it is FDA-cleared, clinically
studied, and dermatologist recommended. Studies have shown that home light-based
hair removal devices like Ulike are relatively safe and effective².

The Benefits of Ulike Sapphire Technology

The main benefit of Ulike Sapphire is long-term hair removal, but it is much
more than just that.

Convenience: Convenience is one of the biggest benefits of using this device, as studies have shown that it can be done from the comfort of your own home at a time that works for you rather than having to head to a hair removal clinic several times².
Cost: While the Ulike IPL hair removal device costs from $289 USD to $329 USD, other methods of long-term hair removal generally
cost much more. Electrolysis can cost upwards of $200 per hour (and you’ll need
at least 10 hours), Laser Hair Removal costs thousands of dollars, and even
waxing has long-term costs of thousands of dollars over the years.
More Areas: For the price, you can target many more areas more cost-effectively than other methods. The Ulike can be used on light
to tan skin types, almost everywhere, other than near the eyes, tattooed areas,
birthmarks, or wounds.
Less Pain: Because of their Ice-Cooling technology,
many users find the Ulike to be less painful than other hair removal methods.
Longer-Lasting Results: Compared to tweezing,
shaving, waxing and other methods, the Ulike removes hair in a long-term or
long-lasting way. Studies have shown that home IPL devices are effective for
long-term hair removal³.

Is IPL Hair Removal Treatment Painful?

Though everyone has a unique pain threshold, most users do not find IPL hair
removal to be particularly painful. Most people compare the sensation of each
flash to a small pinch on the skin or like a rubber band snapping on the skin.
Waxing is usually considered more painful than IPL, for context.

The hair follicle itself is a complex anatomical structure with both long-lasting
components and components that renew on a regular cycle. The hair follicles are
innervated by thousands of both myelinated and unmyelinated afferent nerves,
essentially pain sensors. This means that hair removal causes pain by affecting
these nerves which causes pain immediately and also longer term due to possible
inflammation caused after the hair removal⁵.

With light-based hair removal, the pain is usually caused by the heat which the
light targets into the follicle to thermally destroy it. Devices with cooled
tips, like Ulike, will reduce this source of pain⁵.

It is also important to note that IPL has been shown in studies to be less
painful and cause less inflammation than lasers⁶.

How to Remove Unwanted Hair without Pain by Ulike?

Nearly painless Facial Hair Removal

When it comes to removing facial hair, there are many ways to go about it. Most
of them, however, involve some amount of pain and are also not very
long-lasting. Shaving may be nearly painless, but since it involves simply cutting the
hair shaft near where it protrudes from the skin it does not last long at all.
Waxing, though slightly longer lasting because it plucks the hairs from below
the skin, is painful and can also damage the skin.

IPL devices like Ulike are particularly appealing because it can be done at
home, is relatively nearly painless, and lasts much longer than other methods and can
even be long-lasting for some.

Nearly painless Bikini Hair Removal

The bikini line and bikini area is particularly tricky when it comes to hair
removal. The most common method, waxing, is quite painful and of course needs to
be repeated every 2-3 weeks for most people.

IPL is a great way to remove bikini area hair in a relatively nearly painless way and
with longer lasting results.

Nearly painless Body Hair Removal

Most people do not realize that home IPL devices like the Ulike can be used
almost everywhere on the body! Avoiding some areas like the eyes and any injured
or tattooed skin aside, the IPL can be used on most places such as the face,
neck, chest, arms, legs, feet, buttocks and bikini area.

How Many Hair Removal Sessions are Needed?

Many users of the Ulike IPL device see
visible results within 4 weeks of use, and many even see long-lasting results after
just 8 weeks of proper use. Ulike recommends using it 3 times a week for the
first month, and then 2 times a week the second month. It is also good to
maintain it with regular use weekly or biweekly after that or as needed.
Generally, IPL hair removal has been shown to be most effective in areas of the
body with longer hair growth cycles such as the legs and underarms, while areas
such as the face with shorter growth cycles require more treatments and have
less long-lasting results⁴.

The Ulike IPL device is very effective. Specifically, the Ulike Sapphire Air3
reduced hair density by 90% in 4 weeks of use. The Ulike Sapphire AIR+ showed
78% hair density reduction in just 4 weeks of use.

In contrast, in-office laser hair removal requires around 6 sessions performed
weeks apart and results take up to six months to see a major reduction in hair
growth.

Dos and Don’ts for IPL Treatment – Before and After

First and foremost, read the manual carefully when you receive your Ulike
device. Here are some additional tips to DO and DON’T with IPL treatments.

Do’s for IPL Treatment

Follow the instructions carefully
Conduct a skin test in a hidden area first
Shave the area before treatment
Use eye protection or avert your eyes
Be patient, results can take time
Know that it works best on lighter skin tones with darker hairs (IPL
targets the dark hair roots)

Don’ts for IPL Hair Removal

Avoid sun exposure before and after treatment
Don’t use self tanners or spray tans before treatment
Don’t tweeze or wax between treatments
Don’t use IPL on sensitive areas or pigmented areas (tattoos or
birthmarks)
Ask your doctor before using IPL if you are pregnant
Don’t use peels or other skin treatments while using IPL without
checking with your dermatologist
Don’t use on darker skin color

Conclusion

When it comes to long-lasting removal of unwanted hair, home IPL devices like
the Ulike Air are a fantastic option. These innovative tools are designed to
provide safe and effective hair reduction in the comfort of your own home and at
a lower cost.

By following the instructions and recommendations provided, you should see a
dramatic improvement in hair reduction with little to no pain within a few short
weeks of regular use.

Reference

Gade A, Vasile GF, Rubenstein R. Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) Therapy. PubMed.
Published 2023. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35593833/
‌Town G, Botchkareva NV, Uzunbajakava NE, et al. Light‐based home‐use
devices for hair removal: Why do they work and how effective they are?
Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2019;51(6):481-490.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23061
‌Adhoute H, Hamidou Z, Humbert P, et al. Randomized study of tolerance and
efficacy of a home-use intense pulsed light (IPL) source compared to the hot-wax
method. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2010;9(4):287-290.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-2165.2010.00523.x
Krasniqi A, McClurg DP, Gillespie KJ, Rajpara S. Efficacy of lasers and
light sources in long-term hair reduction: a systematic review. Journal of
Cosmetic and Laser Therapy. 2022;24(1-5):1-8.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2022.2075899
‌Aimonetti JM, Ribot-Ciscar E. Pain management in photoepilation. Journal of
Cosmetic Dermatology. 2015;15(2):194-199. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12196
‌Szima GZ, Janka EA, Kovács A, Bortély B, Bodnár E, Sawhney I, Szabó É,
Remenyik É. Comparison of hair removal efficacy and side effect of
neodymium:Yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and intense pulsed light systems
(18-month follow-up). J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017 Jun;16(2):193-198.
doi:10.1111/jocd.12312